My Journal

Supreme Talker
Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Read/Post Comments (2)
Share on Facebook
President is Obama is an excellent talker, especially if you like his policies. I can imagine many liberal folks nodding in agreement when Obama explained yesterday why he thinks the Supreme Court will uphold his healthcare law. Obama sounded so reasonable when he explained this, except for one small problem: the facts are not on his side. How can Obama say with a straight face that it's "unprecedented" for the Supreme Court to overturn a law put in place by democratically elected representatives? Overturning such laws is one of the things the Supreme Court has been doing for over 200 years.

This is not intended to be blog entry about the pros and cons of the health care bill, nor an entry on what the Supreme Court should or will do. Instead, it's just focused on Obama's words from yesterday on why the Supreme Court will / should uphold the healthcare law.

An editorial in the WSJ today entitled "Obama vs Marbury v Madison" deconstructs this far better than I could...here are the first few paragraphs:


President Obama is a former president of the Harvard Law Review and famously taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago. But did he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison?

That's a fair question after Mr. Obama's astonishing remarks on Monday at the White House when he ruminated for the first time in public on the Supreme Court's recent ObamaCare deliberations. "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress," he declared.

Presidents are paid to be confident about their own laws, but what's up with that "unprecedented"? In Marbury in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall laid down the doctrine of judicial review. In the 209 years since, the Supreme Court has invalidated part or all of countless laws on grounds that they violated the Constitution. All of those laws were passed by a "democratically elected" legislature of some kind, either Congress or in one of the states. And no doubt many of them were passed by "strong" majorities.

As it happens, probably stronger majorities than passed the Affordable Care Act. Readers may recall that the law was dragooned through a reluctant Senate without a single GOP vote and barely the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster. Despite a huge Democratic majority in the House, it passed by only 219-212.


Read/Post Comments (2)

Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Back to Top

Powered by JournalScape © 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved.
All content rights reserved by the author.