On May 25th, President Bush said point blank that Treasury Secretary John Snow had not given him any indication that he was leaving soon:

PRESIDENT BUSH: Secretary of Treasury Snow?

Q Has he given you any indication he intends to leave his job any time soon?…

PRESIDENT BUSH: No, he has not talked to me about resignation. I think he’s doing a fine job.

Yesterday, following Bush’s announcement that Snow was leaving and that Henry “Hank” Paulsen would be taking over at Treasury, Press Secretary Tony Snow (no relation, I assume) had the following exchange with reporters:

QUESTION: Do you have any tick tock on the Paulson…

SNOW: Yes. The tick tock is the two of them met on the 20th of May and there was a conversation. And Hank Paulson accepted the job a day later. That was subject to clearance. It does take time, especially for a Senate confirmable position, to complete those. So it did take time to get some of those clearances wrapped up.

* * *

QUESTION: Can I just ask you one other follow-up…about Secretary Snow? When the president was asked, when he was standing next to Prime Minister Blair and millions of people were watching, he’s telling the American people that: I have got no indication the secretary’s going to resign…

SNOW: "No, He has not talked to me about resignation.” I mean, it was very carefully worded. But again, what you didn’t want to have, I think, is at a period of time when you haven’t finished doing your clearances for the person you want to fill that position, you don’t want to have chaos in the markets. It was…

QUESTION: But he’s already offered it to somebody. He’s got it in hand. I mean, he offered these positions all the time and wait for FBI and background searches that sometimes take a long time. I mean, the Supreme Court nominees take six weeks. But you still announced to the public you’re pick somebody…

SNOW: Well, but you know, again Hank Paulson at that time, you don’t announce somebody who hasn’t been pre-cleared. You haven’t finished the clearance process, you don’t announce it. Period. I mean, it’s just…

QUESTION: But it’s not even announcing him. You could have been direct and said: We’re expecting…

SNOW: Well no — with all due respect, I think there was some concern again about how something like that affects the markets. If you have uncertainty for an extended period of time, which would have been, at that point, four or five days, I think that is something that you’ve got to worry about and you’ve got to be responsible in dealing with it.

-----------------------------------------------------------

So maybe I’m making a mountain out of a molehill…but I don’t think so.

The "No" was a lie. The followup sentence was a clear mispresentation.

We now have the Press Secretary announcing that as far as the “truth” of what the President says is concerned, it is now the position of the President to say, in effect, “I can actively mislead the American people and the U.S. markets if I think it is necessary to prevent the market from responding to, well, the truth of the way things are. I can actively mislead the press if I determine it is in the best interests of the economy.”

I’m sorry, last time I checked, that constitutes manipulation of the market….that constitutes FRAUD on the American people….that seems designed to further erode the trust anyone can have in ANY fact, figure, statement, or economic forecast coming out of the Executive Branch.

Not saying something is one thing…actively misleading the markets and the American people is another.

When, O when, will there be SOME accountability?

(Thanks to thinkprogress.org for capturing the raw data from the White House feed on this issue.)