Thinking as a Hobby


Home
Get Email Updates
LINKS
JournalScan
Email Me

Admin Password

Remember Me

3477975 Curiosities served
Share on Facebook

Bush and Gays
Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Read/Post Comments (11)

Kevin Drum relates this anecdote from Democrat Lanny Davis, a classmate of George W. Bush's at Yale:


One of my most vivid memories is this: A few of us were in the common room one night. It was 1965, I believe — my junior year, his sophomore. We were making our usual sarcastic commentaries on those who walked by us. A little nasty perhaps, but always with a touch of humor. On this occasion, however, someone we all believed to be gay walked by, although the word we used in those days was "queer." Someone, I'm sorry to say, snidely used that word as he walked by.

George heard it and, most uncharacteristically, snapped: "Shut up." Then he said, in words I can remember almost verbatim: "Why don't you try walking in his shoes for a while and see how it feels before you make a comment like that?"

Remember, this was the 1960s — pre-Stonewall, before gay rights became a cause many of us (especially male college students) had thought much about.


What does Drum have to say about this?


Davis seems to think that this somehow excuses Bush's gay marriage demagoguery during the election, something that Bush now appears to be backing away from. "I hope it suggests a return to the 'compassionate conservatism' I remember and that he practiced in his two terms as governor of Texas," he says.

But let's take this at face value — which I'm inclined to do. I don't know Bush's heart any better than anyone, but I've heard enough anecdotes like this to convince me that Bush personally has nothing against gays and nothing against equal rights for gays.

So what does this mean? It means that even though Bush's own moral values dictated tolerance and understanding in this case, he deliberately decided to betray his own beliefs and appeal instead to the most bigoted and divisive aspects of his fellow citizens in order to win the presidency. And he's backing down now only because homophobic bigotry is no longer useful to his ambitions.

Please excuse me while I retch.


So Bill Clinton signed the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as a union only of a man and woman, and Kerry had essentially the same position on gay marriage that Bush did during the campaign (against gay marriage, and for civil unions).

But Bush is the one who "betrayed his own beliefs"?

Exactly who are the bigger hypocrites here?


Read/Post Comments (11)

Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Back to Top

Powered by JournalScape © 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved.
All content rights reserved by the author.
custsupport@journalscape.com