REENIE'S REACH
by irene bean

Photobucket
Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Read/Post Comments (5)
Share on Facebook


SOME OF MY FAVORITE BLOGS I'VE POSTED


2008
A Solid Foundation

Cheers

Sold!

Not Trying to be Corny

2007
This Little Light of Mine

We Were Once Young

Veni, Vedi, Vinca

U Tube Has a New Star

Packing a 3-Iron

Getting Personal

Welcome Again

Well... Come on in

Christmas Shopping

There's no Substitute

2006
Dressed for Success

Cancun Can-Can

Holy Guacamole

Life can be Crazy

The New Dog

Hurricane Reenie

He Delivers

No Spilt Milk

Naked Fingers

Blind

Have Ya Heard the One About?

The Great Caper

Push

Barney's P***S

My New Security System

A Perfect Day

Today was one of those rare perfect days. I awoke perfectly refreshed, swilled a couple of perfect cups of coffee, met with my perfect aunt, cousin, and 2nd cousin, consumed a perfect lunch at the Frist Museum, and then toured the perfectly delightful collection of Dutch Masters that are now on loan at the Frist. It was a perfect day that has segued into a perfect evening.

Though art hogs a lot of space in my life, I'm not much of an art historian. The following are some lay observations regarding the Dutch Masters of the 1500s and 1600s.

1. Most of the paintings had happy dogs romping about the canvas. Lots and lots of romping dogs.

2. Most (if not all) paintings were of ordinary daily life. Landscapes were accented with peasants strolling down country lanes (dogs romping at their sides), or of a barn burning with frantic animals fleeing the flames (dogs dashing ahead of everyone), or kitchens with steamy kettles and such (dogs curled beside the hearth - obviously worn out by all the romping), or gardens and fruited still lifes. I momentarily forgot about romping dogs when I felt *still lifes* didn't look right so I consulted with Professor Google and this was his response: Since in English we don't modify adjectives to reflect plurality of objects and because the phrase "still life" acts as an adjective that describes a noun, we simply throw an 's' on there. And voila - it's "still lifes" What the *bleep*? I've always been challenged by grammatical definitions. There's always waaaay too much dangling.

3. The Dutch Masters were masters of light. Many of the paintings had dark backgrounds so any use of light really popped. I think my exposure to so many California Impressionists has made me more aware of the use of light in paintings. It's mesmerizing for me.

4. I'd forgotten how greatly the Calvinists influenced the Dutch Masters. The following is lifted from Wikipedia: A distinctive feature of the period, compared to earlier European painting, was the small amount of religious painting. Dutch Calvinism forbade religious painting in churches, and though biblical subjects were acceptable in private homes, relatively few were produced. The period is most notable for a huge variety of categories, such as scenes of peasant life, landscapes, townscapes, landscapes with animals, maritime paintings, flower paintings, and romping dogs.

It was the perfect day!


Read/Post Comments (5)

Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Back to Top

Powered by JournalScape © 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved.
All content rights reserved by the author.
custsupport@journalscape.com